@lowfour (post #150) ¿Qué habría que hacer para despedirle? Quiero verle en la puta calle junto con el resto de empresaurios psicópatas y sociópatas que despiden empleados por diversión, creyéndose que están por encima de todo el mundo, que son totalmente impunes y que tienen su poder asegurado mientras juegan con la vida de los demás.
Musk, Trump, Thiel y la obsesión de las élites ultraliberales por la tierra
lowfour
Started 2025-02-06
285 posts
Edited 2025-03-15
Bueno aquí está resumido todo el plan
@lowfour (post #153)
eah, ni maximalista ni leches, están ahí tirando de manual
van por el punto 4
finiquitar LAS DEMOCRACIAS liberales, no es "end america", es "END DEMOCRACY", MECAGONMIVIDA, que estos idiotas son tan chovinistas que no ven más allá de su puto trasero
el 5 da igual, porque las utopías estas son jodidas de analizar, ya que subyugar a la población requiere mucha opresión y violencia
pero yoquesé, ahora con las ia y los media y las redes sociales, lo mismo la peña se convence de que vive en el mejor mundo posible siendo esclavo o algo así
solo que para eso tienen que fundirse todo rastro de democracia, todo es todo
>@elarquitecto (post #154) pero yoquesé, ahora con las ia y los media y las redes sociales, lo mismo la peña se convence de que vive en el mejor mundo posible siendo esclavo o algo así
>
>solo que para eso tienen que fundirse todo rastro de democracia, todo es todo
En el R78 hay muchos viejos, progres y cayetanos que están convencidos que vivimos en la mejor democracia "_que nos hemos dado_", con un paro del tercer mundo desde los 80, desde el 99 directamente con el tercer mundo importado aquí, con la vivienda convertida en un artículo de lujo y con censura feminista y woke. Así que todo es posible.
@Cinta_de_Carromero (post #155)
ES VERDAD OSWALDO, CON FRANCO SI QUE SE VIVÍA DE LA OSTIA COÑO!
Se nota que ni habías nacido y sobre todo que estabas poniéndote BOSTAS a comer Arepas.
@lowfour (post #156) Se nota que tú eres un desertor del arado y te largaste hace muchos años, tienes el mismo contacto con la realidad del R78 que un guiri al que leí en reddit decir que España era el único país del mundo en el que no había pobres.
A ver ojo que en el sitio que he puesto hay un montón de referencias que deberíamos ir desgranando para comprender a estos jetas.
**Summary of Key Points from the Fossil Future Book Launch Event**
**Event Details**
---
**Main Themes & Arguments from Alex Epstein**
**Need for More Fossil Fuels**:
**Framework for Energy Thinking**:
**Flaws in the Anti-Fossil Fuel Movement**:
**Energy Policy Failures**:
---
**Key Insights from Peter Thiel**
**Progress in "Bits" vs. "Atoms"**:
**Critique of Political Correctness & Groupthink**:
**The Role of ESG & Green Policies**:
**Energy & National Security**:
---
**Actionable Strategies & Takeaways**
**Reframing the Energy Debate**:
**Public Influence & Narrative Control**:
**Investment & Industry Priorities**:
**The Current Energy Crisis is a "Teachable Moment"**:
---
**Closing Thoughts**
---
**Final Takeaway**
💡 **The real debate isn’t about science—it’s about values.** **Do we want a future focused on human flourishing or one that prioritizes minimizing human impact at all costs?**
>@lowfour (post #158) 💡 The real debate isn’t about science—it’s about values. Do we want a future focused on human flourishing or one that prioritizes minimizing human impact at all costs?
claro, joputas, vamos a hablar de cosas "no-falsables" y así no hay quien te refute, no?
hablemos de "emociones" en lugar de poner datos encima de la mesa para sacar las mejores conclusiones
hablemos de "verdades" del fanático "religioso" en lugar de las incertidumbres de las respuestas del método científico
iros a cagar a la puta via!
en fin, esto es otra vuelta de tuerca al "identitarismo" ese que hablaba lowfour el otro día, porque te obliga a posicionarte en una identidad u otra, si eres parte de "la sociedad de los valores" entonces eres "de los nuestros" y si no, eres "woke" o de los "otros" (y tironucable, claro)
Aquí hay chicha:
>Regulations have crippled energy, manufacturing, and engineering sectors.
Por eso las supuestas ciudades "network" donde ellos ponen la legislación que les sale de los cojones, ponen su AI no ética, sus gamblings, sus empresas de biotech que se pasan las comisiones de bioética por los cojones, sus criptos....
Vamos, que necesitan una nueva Malta pero no tienen a mano. Pensaban que México y tal, pero les pegaron tres tiros.
@lowfour (post #160)
ya tío, pero es que eso de las regulaciones es un pilar de la humanidad, desde hammurabi (que son las primeras escritas, pero fijo que hay no-escritas anteriores)
pero vamos, que lo que quieren es no pagar impuestos y tener las leyes del far west porque se creen los super-alfas o algo así
a la primera hostia (o al primer oso) revienta todo
@elarquitecto (post #161)
Claro, obvio. Pues lo que les pasó en Cancún... que son todos la polla cuando han vendido 10 pisos y tienen 6 minoyeh de Euros y nosecuantos en cripto, luego les da la visión mística ayn-randiana y acaban como el rosario de la aurora, porque no tienen ni normas ni moral.
Edited 2025-03-16
Ah coño... que vienen todos de este tugurio tan rancio.
El Yarvin, el Vance... la sombra de Ayn Rand.
Valeee vale... vamos a investigar que dicen estos.
>The mission of the Claremont Institute is to restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claremont_Institute
>The Claremont Institute is an American conservative think tank based in Upland, California, founded in 1979 by four students of Harry V. Jaffa.[4] It produces the Claremont Review of Books, The American Mind, and other publications.
>
>The institute was an early defender of Donald Trump.[4] After Joe Biden won the 2020 United States presidential election and Trump refused to concede, Claremont Institute senior fellow John Eastman aided Trump in his failed attempts to overturn the election results.[5][6]
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/03/magazine/claremont-institute-conservative.html
How the Claremont Institute Became a Nerve Center of the American Right (2022)
They made the intellectual case for Trump. Now they believe the country is in a cultural civil war.
Edited 2025-03-16
El Board of Directors
>Tom Klingenstein is the Chairman of the Claremont Institute, he is also a philanthropist, public speaker, writer, and a playwright. **He believes that we are in a cold civil war and that our enemy—what he calls the “Woke regime”**—are winning, in large measure because Republican leaders have yet to engage.
>
>**His essays, speeches and plays all encourage Republicans to do just that— to think, talk, and act as if we are at war.** Among his essays are: “Preserving the American Way of Life”, Fighting the Mob”, “Winning the Cold Civil War”, “Men and the Future of America”, and many others. His work has been published at the Claremont Review of Books, Newsweek, American Mind, American Greatness, and Real Clear Politics.
>
>His speeches such as, “A Man vs. A Movement”, “Trump’s Virtues”, and “Racism in America Today” have been viewed by millions of his fellow Americans. His most recent play, “If Only” explores a fictional interracial love story with Abraham Lincoln playing the role of matchmaker.
ostia, he abierto la caja de pandora
https://americanmind.org/salvo/cold-civil-war-gone-global/
Cold Civil War Gone Global
Kyle Shideler
Who’s America First?
Two monumental events have shaken the U.S. foreign policy establishment since the inauguration of President Donald Trump. They took place at roughly the same time, but few have recognized their connection.
**The first was the widespread exposure of USAID as the “world’s hipster vanguard of globalist, cultural Marxist revolution**,” in the words of J. Michael Waller. When it wasn’t outright funding jihadist terrorism, USAID redirected billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money to left-wing organizers promoting LGBTQ radicalism, anti-racism, climate change, and every other imaginable progressive policy around the globe.
While “charity” CEOs living in taxpayer-funded luxury wailed about how cuts would cost lives, the debate among the online Right was about burning USAID to the ground and salting the earth, or perhaps repurposing some form of foreign aid to support an America First foreign policy agenda.
**The other earthshaking event was Vice President JD Vance’s transformational speech before the Munich Security Conference. Vance warned that our European allies, who cynically appeal to the shared principles that united America and Western Europe during the Cold War, have increasingly shunned the consent of the governed in favor of a heavy-handed bureaucratic censorship regime that resembles our former Soviet enemies.**
The speech rocked Europe and opened a debate on the depth of America’s security commitment. What is the proper role of the U.S. in providing security in Europe? Is it based on geopolitical necessity or shared principles? What kind of Europe would actually be worth defending? Does MAGA merely desire a bigger commitment to NATO funding by European allies? Or a desire to see the U.S. leave Europe to its own devices? Is America First compatible with European nations making their own nations “great again,” thereby becoming allies genuinely worth having?
One can forgive the frustration of the Munich Security Conference crowd in hearing the words of Vice President Vance. For decades now, European elites have been the very best of allies—not for America as a whole but for our ruling class. On all the issues Vance mentioned, whether unchecked migration, censorship, or repression of Christian religious sentiments, European elites are in lockstep with America’s ruling class, and in many cases operate at its insistence.
Foreign Enemies, Domestic Enemies
Burgeoning political strife between Americans at home has come to drive U.S. foreign policy.
The late, great Angelo Codevilla gave us the term “cold civil war” to describe the tense and increasingly uncivil divisions between our ruling class and country class. The ruling class nearly universally holds progressive views and demands progressive policies both here and abroad. Americans of the country class, meanwhile, make up the majority of those who reject the direction of the elites, and who are responsible for electing Donald Trump—twice.
As Codevilla warned,
In revolutionary times or times of profound discord, this approach is especially important: minimize interference in others’ affairs so as to minimize occasions for others’ interference in ours and maintain such military capacity as would discourage anyone from taking advantage of our temporary distraction.
This is not advice the ruling class will accept.
It’s too much to say Europeans were dragged kicking and screaming behind American progressive leadership. They have their own populist revolts they are anxious to put down, after all. But those revolts are being egged on by America’s ruling class, as evidenced by complaints among French elites of the disastrous impact of “le Wokisme.”
Worse still, some of our European allies have intervened directly in our cold civil war. British intelligence played along with the U.S. Intelligence Community’s framing of President Trump (known as “Russiagate”) even though British spies privately suspected the collusion effort was the work of incompetents.
From a strictly strategic assessment, if a foreign nation chooses to intervene in America’s cold civil war, it makes sense to do so on behalf of the ruling class. First, because at least in 2016, their victory seemed highly probable against what seemed to be Trump’s ill-fated presidential run. Secondly, because after 2020 the American ruling class demonstrated it was fully prepared to punish foreign nations they perceived to side with their domestic opponents in the country class.
Much of the driving force of the Biden Administration’s foreign policy from 2020 onward sought to undermine any foreign nation that treated Donald Trump as if he was really president for four years, or warmly greeted his administration in any way. The Netanyahu government in Israel, which played a crucial role in delivering President Trump his signature foreign policy accomplishment in the Abraham Accords, was targeted to be overthrown in a color revolution. The internal Israeli debate over judicial reform was, after all, funded in part through USAID. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates likewise came in for special hostility, and for the same reason.
**Hungary and Brazil were painted with bullseyes as well. President Biden openly called Hungarian President Victor Orban a “dictator.” Democrats went so far as to seek the expulsion of Jair Bolsonaro from the United States after supporters of the former Brazilian president riotously stormed the Brazilian capitol to protest what they viewed as unfair election results (a scenario that might provoke a sense of déjà vu for those prone to notice such things).**
My friend Dave Reaboi likes to note that “Democrats don’t have foreign enemies; they have countries that remind them of domestic enemies,” to describe how the Left has increasingly engaged in foreign policy through the lens of America’s cold civil war. Countries perceived as aiding them against the country class or Trump are allies. Those who do not aid them or are perceived as pro-Trump and pro-populist are enemies.
It was only a matter of time before America’s country class noticed and responded in kind. This is why they frequently cite Ukrainian attempts to intervene in the elections of 2016 and 2024—along with their general perception that Ukraine serves as the offshore slush fund of America’s ruling class—to justify their animosity toward funding Ukraine rather than any geopolitical calculation.
As foreign policy writer Zineb Riboua noted prior to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s disastrous Oval Office appearance,
Zelensky has one card to play, and it’s not some vague appeal to Western values and unity—it’s choosing a side. He needs to confess to the American public what really happened. No more diplomatic hedging, no more pretending everything was fine. He must position himself as a leader who was cornered by Biden’s empty promises, not the so-called ‘Democratic asset’ that Russian propaganda paints him as. It’s a tough situation, but he must acknowledge the perception damage Ukraine has suffered.
Zelensky rejected this very wise advice and was led down the primrose path yet again by Democrats and their European allies. They promised that their applause was more important than securing a deal with the sitting President of the United States.
So Zelensky launched into a hectoring rant about Putin’s geopolitical designs and his risk to Europe. He even warned that America’s oceans would not protect her in the conflicts to come. Maybe that’s true. But in the end, it doesn’t really matter. Because for Americans of both classes the only operating guidance in foreign affairs is “He who is not with me is against me.”
Allies for the Country Class
It would seem that we are too late to heed Codevilla’s wise counsel: that we ought to minimize as best we can foreign interventions in the midst of America’s inner political turmoil.
Which brings us back to USAID. It was not wholly about buying allies for American geopolitical maneuvers against U.S. adversaries like China and Russia, as some of the program’s few remaining proponents on the Right insist. Indeed, evidence suggests the U.S. government’s woke demands hurt traditional American foreign policy, as countries turned to Chinese or Russian backers who were less likely to hector and meddle.
But if USAID wasn’t about geopolitics, neither was it merely just a global Tammany Hall of corruption and money laundering, as many denizens of the digital Right wish to assert.
USAID was about buying allies—not for America, but for America’s ruling class. Its programs were aimed at creating cadres of loyal progressive members, both at home and abroad. The American ruling class invested in building up foreign alliances to be used against opponents of their cause, both foreign and domestic.
While President Trump may or may not succeed in temporarily pausing that effort, it is one that ultimately will continue to advance, fed by foreign governments and progressive foundations, and will be restarted in earnest as soon as the Democrats retake the presidency.
For the time the Trump Administration is in office, the country class must find allies for itself abroad as their domestic opponents have done. Vance’s performance in Munich suggests it can. While ostensibly aimed at European elites, warning them of the dangers of their current course, the vice president’s speech should also be understood as a clarion call to prospective allies within those countries, providing them a standard around which to rally.
For years the Left has used NGOs as a recruiting ground for future foreign policy experts, diplomats, and administrators to staff the government, and especially the foreign policy and national security bureaucracy. MAGA ought to do likewise. The Trump Administration should use a portion of U.S. foreign aid to promote agreement on its own principles, such as sovereignty, patriotism, reversing mass migration, respect for national customs and traditions, and opposition to censorship. Doing so would have benefits—both in terms of the administration winning allies abroad and helping train and equip its supporters.
The more die-hard libertarian-minded of the Trump coalition may say that U.S. dollars should remain at home no matter what. One can certainly argue that helping minority Afrikaners defend private property rights is no more worthy a cause than Colombian transgender opera. But realistically, whether it’s this administration or some future administration, the U.S. government will continue to provide foreign aid abroad at some level. And as much as geopolitical strategists might wish otherwise, Americans in the short term will continue to view foreign affairs through the lens of domestic political warfare.
America’s cold civil war has become, and will remain, a global conflict. Not by our choice but because the ruling class deliberately made the decision to widen the political battlefield to the entire globe. The only question is whose allies will be helped and whose enemies will be punished.
**MAGA should take the opportunity to forge for itself allies abroad who share its vision of the world.**
Edited 2025-03-16
Al loro quien firma ese texto pro-ruso (Orban BUENOOOOO)
Director for Homeland Security & Counterterrorism @claremontinst alum. D&D references, cat & dog pictures & obscure extremist lit.
Al loro los Scholars. NI UNA TIA
>@lowfour (post #166) Al loro quien firma ese texto pro-ruso (Orban BUENOOOOO)
>
>
Ese judío apoya a Orban porque es otra putita de la judiada, no porque fuera pro-ruso o anti-ruso.
Vaya apellidos tienen en ese think tank ¿se reunen en una sinagoga directamente?
>@lowfour (post #167) Al loro los Scholars. NI UNA TIA
Eso es normal en los think tanks, las mujeres en política están donde las colocan sus maridos (como hace el PP) o donde pueden trincar (como hace el PSOE). Como en los think tanks no hay acceso directo al poder ni postureo público, ahí acaban los pensadores en la sombra y eso es de hombres.
@lowfour (post #167)
menudo campo nabos eso, eh?
está claro que es el patriarcado en su versión más rancia lo que se está revolviendo en su tumba y tratando de resurgir cual zombi incel desnortao
che, cuanto más pones, más claro es el cinta como agente "bot" (ciberputi), porque nos viene soltando las mierdas spam del momento, ahora están con "los valores" pata negra de la auténtica esencia de la humanidad o algo así
no es una reacción a las "hiperidentidades", sino que explota sus inconsistencias, su propio carácter neocatecumental, como diciendo, queréis "identidades", pues sujétame el cubata que tengo una que vale por todas, el resto son una mierda en comparación... y encima totalitarismo identitario con "minorías", lo mío, machoalfismo, es mayoritario y aun más totalitario, vótame!
expórtese y guerracivilisece!
dinero a paletadas para esto y muchimillonarios que se suben al carro viendo medrar el asunto, leyendo su versión "libertaria" (casposa) y oso-viciosa (ketaminica)
@lowfour (post #167)
oye, que estos ofrecen becas a sheriff!!
_Each fellowship is designed for a different audience, but all are equal in their intense curriculum of daily seminars and relaxed **evening symposia examining the historical arc leading from the American Founding to the progressivism of today.**_
te adoctrinamos en "historia" para que puedas pegar tiros a los "malos" que te vamos a señalar
luego que si no hay SA en usa y por tanto no hay peligro de fascismo... nomejodas
@elarquitecto (post #170)
Buah lo de natural law es el colmo de conspiranoic preper deluxe
Edited 2025-03-17
>@elarquitecto (post #169) che, cuanto más pones, más claro es el cinta como agente "bot" (ciberputi), porque nos viene soltando las mierdas spam del momento, ahora están con "los valores" pata negra de la auténtica esencia de la humanidad o algo así
Que es todo mentira, son judíos defendiendo a la judiada a través de engañar _good goys_ , se puede ver en cómo dicen cosas como que Ucrania o cualquier otro país "o está con nosotros, o contra nosotros", en el sentido de que todos los países del mundo tendrían que ser vasallos obedientes suyos............. ¿excepto qué país del mundo, que recibe barra libre de impresora y armas para matar niños palestinos y que sin embargo luego les lleva su ropa sucia a que la laven en la casa blanca?
Si es que son sudistas de esos, quieren restablecer la esclavitud o algo
Edited 2025-03-17
@lowfour (post #173)
tío, luego dices que no tienen un "movimiento" o algo así, para hacerse un reich
pues no sé, eh?? fijo que venden camisetas y gorras con "maga" o algo...
tú te imaginas a una merkel posteando un tuit así?
mejor dicho, reposteando de @quieropetartelkaka69
>@elarquitecto (post #174) tú te imaginas a una merkel posteando un tuit así?
Prefiero no imaginarme a la _culona intrombabile_, en general
bueno, si despides a 25k por tus santos cojonazos, pues igual pasan cosas...
la movida es que esto les va a servir de "incendio del reichstag" para pausar indefinidamente la constitución y consolidar su estado policial-fascita-trucho
si no acaba en guerra civil, acabará en campos de concentración o peña deportada a "venezuela" o cosas así
@elarquitecto (post #177)
Vale, en USA igual cuela, pero la caída de ventas es global. El golpe a Tesla es de difícil recuperación.
Polestar ha hecho campañas y está descontando 10k o 20k a peña que quiere deshacerse de su masa amorfa con ruedas, pero es que el problema es que los de segunda mano no los quiere ni dios tampoco. A ver quién cojones se compra un TEsla ahora, aparte de un MAGA irrecuperable, carne de centro de día.
@lowfour (post #178)
tesla es el típico producto que nadie debería comprar, porque realmente no "compras" el coche, al menos no del todo, ya que te lo puede capar en remoto porque no le has puesto la pieza "de marca" o algo así
es más, los de segunda mano son un dolor de muelas, porque tienes que pedirle permiso a tesla para hacer el cambio de titular y pasan muchas cosas por las que tesla te lo niega
en fin, no me da ninguna pena
Edited 2025-03-19
@elarquitecto (post #179)
Bueno, eso es así con todo... hasta con los tractores John Deere, que los granjeros se tuvieron que hacer un curso acelerado de hackers para poder repararlos.
Please log in to reply to this discussion.
Log In