@lowfour (post #209) Le mató la CIA, lo reconocieron oficiosamente a través de la OTAN, algo así como que la OTAN iba a hacer "whatever it takes" para que no gobernase nunca un partido _bad goy_ .
Yo creo que le mataron de la misma forma que a Diana de Gales, con algún mecanismo de interferencia electrónica a distancia que solamente tiene EEUU y sus países sicarios como el RU.
>@elarquitecto (post #210) teniendo en cuenta que somos un país católico, ni tan mal... como irlanda
Es que el catolicismo es MUY maricón, mucho más que el protestantismo o el calvinismo, es culto a las mujeres a través de las vírgenes, considerar pecado todo lo masculino y mariconear en privado entre sotanas. Los ortodoxos lo son mucho menos que los católicos, pero es un rollo parecido que se nota menos porque los países ortodoxos están todavía en vías de mariconización.
La judiada por ejemplo es una religión de hombres, cobardes y psicópatas pero hombres.
Para desmariconizar el catolicismo habría que:
-Acabar con una de las mayores reuniones de maricones del mundo que es el Vaticano, ahí hay que entrar a desinfectar a fondo la sodomía que hay ahí reunida.
-Poner en los puestos altos a intelectuales no degenerados como Benedicto pero de los dispuestos a echarle cojones en vez de dimitir
-Permitir que los curas tengan familia e hijos, esto atraería a muchos hombres mentalmente sanos que ahora están excluidos
-Abandonar el rollete de moral de los esclavos, hay que tener orgullo y dignidad y no dejarse pisar por otros, lo que no significa convertirse en depredadores sino solamente defenderse de los depredadores
Por supuesto no va a ocurrir, han tenido oportunidades de cambiar y no les ha dado la gana, prefieren seguir mariconeando mientras los evangélicos (cristianos controlados por el sionismo) les comen la tostada.
@Cinta_de_Carromero (post #211)
Menudo miércoles tenemos. Menuda sarta de gilipolleces
@lowfour (post #213) Lo de Diana de Gales es vox populi en el mundillo del espionaje. Yo no tengo una opinión sobre ese caso, pero sí la tengo con que a Haider se lo cargaron de una forma parecida saboteando su coche.
@lowfour (post #213)
el elon, que les exige horas extra a los ciberputis
anda el pavo crecidito ahora que va a ser "lider munidal" en la "sombra" (es que al sol se quema enseguida
ya se va viendo la jugada, eh??
ultranancys del misterio son "boosteados" por los ciberputis caraqueños (o indios o lumpen-país que sea) a cambio de... efectivamente, groenlandia y lo que tercie
porque ya sabes, yo te hago el favor... pero...
@elarquitecto (post #216)
Espera que hay otra buena
@lowfour (post #217)
por eso querían incorporar ucrania por la puerta de atrás, porque esto se lo sabían
Os digo yo que van a por las tierras raras y tal, montarán una planta de baterías de Tesla y tal. Por eso está Musk tan emocionado.
Menudo GUANO tenemos eh?
Van a comerle el Pastel a Europa?
@lowfour (post #220)
unos joden los recursos de ucrania
los otros de dinamarca
cojonuden todo esto
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/08/world/europe/blinken-france-trump.html?smid=url-share
**Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and his French counterpart, Jean-Noël Barrot**, spoke on Wednesday in Paris of the challenges already posed to U.S. alliances by the imminent return of Donald J. Trump to the White House, and **said they believed that an American takeover of Greenland was an impossible idea.**
But they also asserted that their nations would try to continue working together through potential political turbulence in the coming years, including the war in Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East.
European leaders have been focused in recent days on what many consider inflammatory statements from Mr. Trump and his allies. The president-elect has said he would like to make Greenland part of the United States. The autonomous territory is controlled by Denmark, a NATO ally. And a senior adviser, the billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, has declared his support for a far-right political party in Germany.
**“The idea expressed about Greenland is obviously not a good one, but maybe more important, it’s obviously one that’s not going to happen,” Mr. Blinken said at a news conference with Mr. Barrot. “So we probably shouldn’t waste a lot of time talking about it.”**
He prefaced that with advice clearly intended for Mr. Trump: “We’re stronger, we’re more effective, we get better results when we’re working closely with our allies, not saying things that may alienate them.”
Mr. Barrot agreed that he did not think the United States would invade Greenland, but said: “Do we think that we are entering a period in which we’re returning to the law of the jungle? The answer is yes.”
Image
A view from above of red and blue buildings near an icy blue sea.
Greenland is becoming of increasing strategic importance.Credit...Carsten Snejbjerg for The New York Times
Later, in remarks on Ukraine, he put President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia squarely in that context, too.
“It is a matter of the future of international law,” Mr. Barrot said. “If we accept Ukraine capitulating, we would allow force to prevail. It is a matter of security for the French people, as well as for Europeans.”
Mr. Blinken’s stop in Paris is part of a final, whirlwind diplomatic trip in which he is visiting Asian and European allies. He met with officials in Seoul on Monday, in the middle of the biggest political crisis in South Korea in decades; had talks in Tokyo the next day, soon after the Biden administration blocked a steel-industry merger that Japanese officials wanted; and then flew overnight to Paris, going via Alaska to avoid Russian air space.
Mr. Blinken’s visits to South Korea and Japan were a reflection of the importance of those nations in the U.S. government’s calculus for establishing military deterrence against China and North Korea. Both are key allies that host U.S. military bases and troops. And France has been one of the most important allies in opposing Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and supplying the Ukrainian military with weapons.
Like other European officials, those in Paris are anxious about the return of Mr. Trump, though few were truly surprised by the outcome of the U.S. election.
In Mr. Blinken, President Biden has a diplomat well suited to trying to reassure the French: He grew up in an intellectual milieu in Paris and speaks fluent French, which he deployed here in an ornate room in the Foreign Ministry, in what was almost certain to be his final overseas news conference as secretary of state.
Both Mr. Blinken and Mr. Barrot underscored in their opening remarks the diplomacy their nations have done together during recent crises, notably the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon and the war between Russia and Ukraine. Their nations have also tried to coordinate on policies toward Syria, where rebels recently toppled Bashar al-Assad, the longtime dictator.
“I am delighted that you will continue carrying the torch over the next months on these crucial issues for our two countries,” Mr. Blinken told Mr. Barrot.
The French minister praised Mr. Blinken, using language that appeared to carry veiled criticism of the America represented by Mr. Trump.
“You have embodied the face of the America that we love,” Mr. Barrot said. He spoke of a nation that built an “international order based on law” after World War II through “its lofty outlook, its visceral attachment to the values of freedom.”
Image
Two diplomats walking down a hallway.
Mr. Barrot and Mr. Blinken before their meeting.Credit...Pool photo by Thibault Camus
At one point, he said, “We survived some 59 American elections, and of course we’ll survive the 60th American election.”
Among their worries, European leaders are concerned about the possibility that Mr. Trump will impose new tariffs in a period of anemic growth in Europe compared with the United States.
Mr. Blinken’s visit comes at a time of intense domestic political division for France. It is a moment that François Bayrou, the centrist prime minister appointed last month, has called the “most difficult” situation for the country since the end of World War II. But for the time being, those divisions mostly affect France’s domestic policy, particularly its inability to pass a budget.
All of this has served to weaken the hand of President Emmanuel Macron at home. But under the French system, Mr. Macron, who considers himself a pragmatic centrist, still holds great sway when it comes to foreign affairs. That has provided a certain continuity in the French posture toward Mr. Trump.
That posture is a mix of concern, caution and Mr. Macron’s belief that he has a clear-eyed view of the American president-elect and his mercurial governing style. Mr. Macron was elected president in 2017, the same year that Mr. Trump took office for his first term.
Over the years, the French president has sought to preserve the French-American relationship while preparing his country — and Europeans more generally — for the possibility that the continent may increasingly have to fend for itself militarily, given Mr. Trump’s skepticism about the U.S. role in NATO.
At a campaign event last year, Mr. Trump implied that he would not abide by NATO’s collective defense provision, known as Article 5, and even said he would “encourage” Russia “to do whatever the hell they want” to countries that had not contributed sufficiently to the alliance.
During his yearly New Year’s Eve speech, Mr. Macron, reiterating a position he has taken many times before, said that Europe could no longer “delegate to other powers its security and its defense,” vowing to continue to invest in French “military rearmament.”
Image
President Emmanuel Macron, left, and his new prime minister, François Bayrou, on Monday.Credit...Pool photo by Aurelien Morissard
On Monday, Mr. Macron raised concerns about Mr. Musk, who recently used his social media platform, X, to praise a German far-right party and assail Britain’s Labour Party prime minister.
Without mentioning Mr. Musk’s name, Mr. Macron said: “Ten years ago, if we had said that the owner of one of the largest social networks in the world would support a new international reactionary force and would intervene directly in elections, including in Germany, who would have imagined it?”
On Wednesday, when asked at the news conference about Mr. Musk, Mr. Blinken said, “Private citizens in our country can say what they want, what they believe, and everyone else can draw their own conclusions and take their own positions on the matter.”
Mr. Barrot said the same about Mr. Musk. Soon afterward, Mr. Blinken got into a convoy to go to the Élysée Palace to meet with Mr. Macron and to receive the Légion d’Honneur, given by the French to people they consider true friends.
@lowfour (post #222)
hay pulso, eh? se están midiendo la ~~polla~~ relación de poder... en principio un estado como francia o la ue debería poder contra un musk, pero claro, están los truchos en el capitolio ya afilando los alfanjes, nos van a abordar
mirad, los troyanos ya ni se esconden
A todo esto:
https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-pneumonia/
The European Commission president cancels engagements in Lisbon and Gdańsk after falling ill.
Mira aquí explican la obsesión de Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/08/why-is-donald-trump-talking-about-annexing-greenland
Why is Donald Trump so fixated with Greenland?
Trump has said the US needs control of Greenland – and the Panama canal – for “economic security” and has described ownership and control of the territory as an “absolute necessity”. Greenland has long been on Trump’s radar as a target for purchase and in 2019 he confirmed reports that he had been urging aides to find out how the US could buy the vast Arctic island, describing a sale as “essentially a large real estate deal”.
As well as oil and gas, Greenland’s supply of multiple in-demand raw materials for green technology is attracting interest from around the world – including from China, which dominates global rare earth production and has threatened to restrict the export of critical minerals. By acquiring Greenland, the US could keep China out.
Strategically positioned between the US and Russia, Greenland is viewed as increasingly important for defence and is emerging as a geopolitical battleground as the climate crises worsens.
**The rapid melting of the island’s huge ice sheets and glaciers could open up oil drilling (although Greenland in 2021 stopped granting exploration licences) and mining for essential minerals including copper, lithium, cobalt and nickel.**
**Melting Arctic ice is also opening up new shipping routes, providing alternatives to the Suez canal through the Arctic that shorten the journey from western Europe to east Asia by almost half. China and Russia agreed in November to collaborate on developing new Arctic shipping routes.**
Greenland is already an important military base for the US and its ballistic missile early warning system. The US has had a military base at Pituffik (previously Thule) since the cold war.
@lowfour (post #226)
el saqueo habitual, solo que ya no se trata de irak o afganistan o algo así, ahora es propiamente europa
@lowfour (post #225)
como la espiche vonderleyen nos cagamos, pero en plan cinta cuando se pasa con el anisete al día siguiente...
me estoy acordando de 2020, que pintaba feo en enero, pero ni de coña nos esperábamos el panorama que vino
@elarquitecto (post #228)
Todo eso junto al H5N1 que está desbocado, a una mutación de hacerse muy infeccioso y con muertos ya en USA, la leche infectada, los huevos infectados, la carne de vacuno infectada.
Recomendación:
Mañana voy a hacer acopio de FFP2, que lo sepáis. Recomendación de virólogo en excedencia vitalicia
@lowfour (post #229)
oye cinta, tengo un reto para ti, especialmente lo de las palomas... 🤣
tan negacionista que eres, a que no te la pasas lamiendo palomas de la calle?? eh??
>@lowfour (post #230) Mañana voy a hacer acopio de FFP2, que lo sepáis. Recomendación de virólogo en excedencia vitalicia
Ya vas tarde, yo las tengo todavía del covid porque sabía que las mochileras iban a volver a crear otra pandemia en breve.
>@elarquitecto (post #231) oye cinta, tengo un reto para ti, especialmente lo de las palomas... 🤣
>
>tan negacionista que eres, a que no te la pasas lamiendo palomas de la calle?? eh??
Ya estás tú para andar lamiendo cosas en la sauna Paraíso. Y el negacionista serás tú que te creíste que con las ~~2~~ 3 dosis del covid ya te convertirías en invulnerable.
Yo como sabía que eso era mentira, seguí usando mascarillas y seguí sin pillar mierdas mientras todos caían donde trabajaba, los días de ómicron estaba yo solo de cientos de personas.
Las elecciones en Alemania son dentro de un mes, al ritmo de atentados sunníes importados que llevan yo creo que hasta la lesbiana de AfD va a subir mucho de votos.
Luego vendrán los lloros de por qué la gente vota a la ultramegahiperturboderecha en vez de a partidos progres que quieren seguir importándolos.
pocas palomas está lamiendo cinta, eh??
se ve que es más de cagar spam trucho
Estais los progres con dosis extra de Almax ¿eh? 😄 Pues no os queda nada, si esto acaba de empezar.
Si, almax y FORTASEC es lo que va a necesitar el HOMBRETÓN ARIO Y NAZI ESTE, antisemita que escribe un diario ultraderechista. Pero QUE VALIENTE ES CUANDO ESCRIBE eh?
@lowfour (post #237) La violencia política contra los rivales se sabe cómo empieza, pero no cómo acaba, luego que no haya quejas de los que la empezaron.
ostia en toda la boca al "feijoo" germano
lo escuché ayer en la radio y me estaba partiendo la caja 🤣
por qué? porque los diputados se han saltado la disciplina de partido, o sea, daban los números en plan "partido", pero luego... se ve que en alemania lo de conseguir escaño es más "local" que aquí, y por mucho que te diga tu partido que votes mierda, si éso te va a joder la reeleción, votas lo que te la asegure
_El resultado, 338 votos a favor y 349 en contra, cayó como una sorpresa al final de una jornada de infarto en el Bundestag. Merz contaba, **en principio, con una mayoría segura, al disponer de los votos de su formación, CDU/CSU, AfD, los liberales y el partido de izquierda antiinmigración de Sahra Wagenknecht**. Además de la abstención de un grupo de democristianos, entre sus aliados liberales **23 se abstuvieron o votaron en contra**._
unos se piraron, otros votaron abiertamente en contra, pero lo jodido es eso de la "izquierda anti-inmi" que vienen siendo los rojipardos detodalavida, los joseantonio presente y tal...
ah, y aparte de merkel, fue la iglesia católica (y alguna evangélica de esas) las que dijeron que se votara que no a la ley esa anti-immi que significaba romper el cordón sanitario contra la ultraderecha putiniana de afd
es curioso que tengan que ser los chupacirios los que pongan un poco de cordura en todas estas mierdas, bulos y falacias ciberputis contra los inmis, que no es más que racismo cada vez peor disimulado
Please log in to reply to this discussion.
Log In