Algo Pasa con la Ofensiva Rusa. Tercer Año de Masacre (III)

lowfour
lowfour
Started 2024-02-27
1712 posts
lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1681

@elarquitecto (post #1680)

Bueno, el Kim ya dice que va a ir a saco y que va a mandar 100.000 famélicos a luchar a Kursk. Si eso no es una escalada, yo ya no se.

Vlad contaba una hipotética conversación con Putin en las llamadas de hace unos días.

Trump: Oye que vamos a parar la guerra y fijamos las lineas actuales

Putin: Ya, pero es que los ukros tienen Kursk

Trump: Eso es tu problema, resuélvelo

Putin: Vale, dame hasta diciembre.

Obviamente Vlad dice que no tiene ni puta idea de lo que hablaron, pero es bastante plausible. Los rusos quieren vaciar Kursk cueste lo que cueste y entonces querrán que Trump ponga de rodillas a Ucrania y quedarse con todo el pastel, recargar las pilas 5 años y volver a atacar Georgia o las bálticas.

Por eso los misiles que, en teoría, solo pueden usar inicialmente en el contexto de la defensa de Kursk... pero vamos, me da a mi que van a empezar a volar bases rusas y trenes y puentes y de todo.

Tampoco es que tengan reservas infinitas de ATACMS o Storm Shadows, pero suelen ser bastante letales.

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-18
#1682

@lowfour (post #1681)

justo es lo que "dice" galileo

Image

bueno, no ata los cabos como nosotros, pero ya es casual que autoricen los atacams y salga esto de que hay tropas a saco en kursk y de las buenas (yo no sé si les quedan muchos "elite vdv" pero se ve que sí)

recuperar a cualquier coste... se vienen ostias como panes

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-18
#1683

Image

Image

el problema es que ucrania no tiene 100 leopardos de esos, eh?

estaría gracioso que tuviera unos cuantos más


lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1684

@elarquitecto (post #1683)

No entiendo a occidente. Nos están echando un órdago brutal de un imperio de mierda y hacemos luchar a los que nos paran la oleada de orcos con las manos atadas con los misiles y tal.

Por eso me encanta el liderazgo de Zelensky. Ha logrado lo que necesitaba en cada momento, ha exigido lo que no le daban, ha recordado que lo de Rusia no es una batalla que se circunscribe a Ucrania, sino que es un órdago global. Y encima están montando una industria de drones, misiles y de todo que se van a cagar, mas joint ventures con Rheinmetall y otras empresas. Si los misiles lo hacen los ukros, los pueden tirar donde quieran.

Ya la última ha sido dejar caer que pueden hacerse con armas nucleares si los dejan tirados.

Os imagináis que esto pasa con un mierda como el Feijoo al mando del país invadido? Un puto blando mentiroso que solo sabe soltar mierda y balones fuera? Ucrania existe porque tenían un Zelensky, porque si no ya estaban esclavizados y siendo genocidados.

Por cierto, que no todo es malo sobre la ayuda en occidente. Los Bradleys (de los que habían mandado "pocos") en realidad son reemplazados sin límites. Como vidas infinitas, vamos. El problema es que hubiera molado dejar a Ucrania con 600 Bradleys sobre el terreno en vez de los 300 que les han dado.

Yo creo que de aquí al verano de 2025 vamos a ver el inicio del fin para uno de los combatientes.

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-18
#1685

@lowfour (post #1684)

Image

firmas para que te maten en 2-3 semanas

antes iban chavales de 21 años, ahora la media es de 38, sin entrenamiento y básicamente "criminales"

supongo que habrá que actualizarlo en breve con los best-koreaners que lleguen

y bueno, lo de si nos pilla algo así con un feijoo, no te despistes, que hay otros "truchos" peores:

Image

por si no te queda claro:

Image

la "evidencia del campo de batalla"

venganomejodas, evidencia de que palman casi 2000 ruskis diarios?? no?

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1686

@elarquitecto (post #1685)

Menuda basura.

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1687

Alemania da 4000 drones llamados "mini-taurus" (nada que ver con los misiles taurus) que parece que tienen cierta AI en su funcionamiento.

https://united24media.com/latest-news/germany-to-deliver-4000-mini-taurus-suicide-drones-to-ukraine-3788



Germany to Deliver 4,000 "Mini-Taurus" Suicide Drones to Ukraine



Germany is reportedly set to begin large-scale deliveries of suicide drones to Ukraine. These drones possess high autonomy under electronic warfare conditions and can effectively strike targets at significant distances.

This was reported by the German outlet Bild, citing its sources and statements from Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, calling the drones “mini-Taurus“.

Helsing is a German company specializing in defense technology that develops software and incorporates artificial intelligence into military systems. It collaborates with leading defense manufacturers such as SAAB and Rheinmetall and has been active in Ukraine since 2022.

The company has reportedly received an order for 4,000 such drones for Ukraine. Starting in December, they may begin arriving in batches of several hundred per month.

Some prototypes are said to be already undergoing testing and refinement in real combat conditions in Eastern Ukraine.

On February 24, Alexander Kamyshin, Minister of Strategic Industries, and Gundbert Scherf, CEO and co-founder of Helsing GmbH, signed a Memorandum of Understanding to collaborate in the security and defense sector.

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1688

Esta es la empresa creo

https://helsing.ai/

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1689
Edited 2024-11-18

Mira, están contratando "Drone Field Technicians", supongo que para ir a Ucrania.

https://helsing.ai/jobs/4345720101



>

You should apply if:


>
>

**Are passionate about protecting liberal democratic values by contributing to the defense and security sector**


>
lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1690
Edited 2024-11-18

Espera que se ve que les ha sentado bien a los rusos

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg5l1220zxo

Image


Fury in Russia at missile move but Putin so far silent



President Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia with long-range missiles supplied by the US has sparked a furious response in Russia.

**"Departing US president Joe Biden… has taken one of the most provocative, uncalculated decisions of his administration, which risks catastrophic consequences," declared the website of the Russian government newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta on Monday morning.**

Russian MP Leonid Slutsky, head of the pro-Kremlin Liberal-Democratic Party, predicted that the decision would "inevitably lead to a serious escalation, threatening serious consequences".

Russian senator Vladimir Dzhabarov called it "an unprecedented step towards World War Three".

Anger, yes. But no real surprise.

Komsomolskaya Pravda, the pro-Kremlin tabloid, called it "a predictable escalation".

What really counts, though, is what Vladimir Putin calls it and how the Kremlin leader responds.

He said nothing on Sunday night.

But Russia’s president has said plenty before.

**In recent months, the Kremlin has made its message to the West crystal clear: do not do this, do not remove restrictions on the use of your long-range weapons, do not allow Kyiv to strike deep into Russian territory with these missiles.**

**In September President Putin warned that if this were allowed to happen, Moscow would view it as the "direct participation" of Nato countries in the Ukraine war.

"This would mean that Nato countries… are fighting with Russia," he continued.**

The following month, the Kremlin leader announced imminent changes to the Russian nuclear doctrine, the document setting out the preconditions under which Moscow might decide to use a nuclear weapon.

This was widely interpreted as another less-than-subtle hint to America and Europe not to allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with long-range missiles.

Guessing Vladimir Putin’s next moves is never easy.

But he has dropped hints.

**Back in June, at a meeting with the heads of international news agencies, Putin was asked: how would Russia react if Ukraine was given the opportunity to hit targets on Russian territory with weapons supplied by Europe?

"First, we will, of course, improve our air defence systems. We will be destroying their missiles," President Putin replied.**

**"Second, we believe that if someone is thinking it is possible to supply such weapons to a war zone to strike our territory and create problems for us, why can’t we supply our weapons of the same class to those regions around the world where they will target sensitive facilities of the countries that are doing this to Russia?"**



(les sobran los misiles hoyga, tienen para dar y tomar)



In other words, arming Western adversaries to strike Western targets abroad is something Moscow has been considering.

In my recent interview with Alexander Lukashenko, the leader of Belarus, Putin's close ally seemed to confirm the Kremlin has been thinking along these lines.

Mr Lukashenko told me he had discussed the subject at a recent meeting with Western officials.

**"I warned them. 'Guys, be careful with those long-range missiles,'" Mr Lukashenko told me.**

"The Houthi [rebels] might come to Putin and ask for coastal weapons systems that can carry out terrifying strikes on ships.

**"And if he gets his revenge on you for supplying long-range weapons to [President] Zelensky by supplying the Houthis with the Bastion missile system? What happens if an aircraft carrier is hit? A British or American one. What then?"**

How long-range missiles striking Russia could affect Ukraine war

But some of the media reaction in Russia appeared designed to play things down.

"The Russian armed forces had already [previously] intercepted ATACMS missiles during attacks on the Crimean shore," a military expert told the Izvestia newspaper, which went on to suggest that President-elect Trump might "revise" the decision.

This is, to put it mildly, an unusual situation.

In two months’ time, President Biden will be out of office and Donald Trump will be in the White House.

The Kremlin knows that President-elect Trump has been far more sceptical than President Biden about military assistance for Ukraine.

Will that be a factor in Vladimir Putin’s calculations as he formulates Russia’s response?



Cinta_de_Carromero
Cinta_de_Carromero
2024-11-18
#1692
>

@lowfour (post #1689) protecting liberal democratic values



Leyendo "_liberal democratic values_" me vienen a la mente travestidos peludos y maquillados de drag queen leyendo cuentos a niños y ladrillo caro con mucho ESG y DEI, tendrían que poner "_protecting civilian lives_" o similar si hablar abiertamente de soberanía les parece demasiado fachanazi.

De nada sirve detener a la horda si al volver a casa te encuentras como Rambo en la 1, de mendigo vagando por los pueblos porque todo el ladrillo está reservado para los burgueses que viven de la impresora que llevan desde la noche de la invasión de 2022 mirando para otro lado o directamente intentando bloquear la ayuda a Ucrania.

Jag
Jag
2024-11-18
#1696

@lowfour (post #1693)

No me jodas, eso es un p**o IGLA soviético de los viejos..... pedazo de misiles los rusos ehhhh!!! que los tiras con un manpad de los 70!!!!!!

Jag
Jag
2024-11-18
#1697

@lowfour (post #1695)

Eso ya es pura suerte creo yo. Más posibilidades tenía el que iba con el manpad al hombro corriendo que el de las balitas......

Jag
Jag
2024-11-18
#1698

@lowfour (post #1694)

De nuevo un IGLA... yvan 3 de 3 en los vídeos. Baratos..... y viejos....... No sé. los rusos están tirando lo que pueden,\.... pero es que lo que pueden es mierda obsoleta.......

El que sepa un pelo de qué va esto, sabe que no tienen dos tortas con lo que están lanzando.

Lo siguiente es pararles los ICBMs con tirachinas....o mejor enviamos unos cuantos honderos baleares a ver......

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1699

La cara de los lazis-Volodyas es de hormigón armado. Amenazan de nuevo con guerra nuclear, que Biden es el lord de la guerra y no quiere la paz que trae el buenecito de Trump, JAJAJ.

Kursk para Ucrania para siempre.

Dios que genialidad lo de Kursk. Que puta genialidad.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1gu12ur/fuck_me_these_reactions_are_priceless_i_cant_stop/

Basura que miente y se descojona mintiendo.

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-18
#1701

El The Economist nos cuenta como practica la limpieza étnica Rusia en los territorios ocupados.

https://www.economist.com/europe/2024/11/10/kremlin-occupied-ukraine-is-now-a-totalitarian-hell



Kremlin-occupied Ukraine is now a totalitarian hell


The Trump administration should remember Vladimir Putin’s dark vision



Image

A view shows multi-storey residential buildings destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the town of Severodonetsk in the Luhansk region

photograph: reuters

Nov 10th 2024|kyiv

On google street view it is possible to “drive” around parts of towns that have been occupied by Russia in Ukraine since its invasion in February 2022. To do so is to drive back in time. The images were taken before the assault. Since then, many buildings have been destroyed, some streets have new names and the clocks have changed. The area runs on Moscow time, an hour ahead of the rest of Ukraine.

Donald Trump’s incoming administration may push for an armistice or peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. That might leave a fifth of Ukraine under Russian occupation, and the size of this area could easily expand in the coming months if the Kremlin intensifies its offensive, which has been gaining ground. To get a sense of Vladmir Putin’s dark vision for any territory he permanently gains, it is worth looking at conditions in occupied Ukraine now.

Read more of our recent coverage of the Ukraine war

“Kiril”, a Ukrainian agent in occupied territory reached by phone, says that “this is a prison society” because the fear of being denounced forces everyone to keep their views to themselves. To be without a Russian passport these days is “like being a refugee in your own land”. Important jobs are almost all held by Russians. Anyone with pro-Ukrainian views fears being sent “to the basement”, an expression for Russia’s network of detention and “filtration” camps. All traces of Ukraine are being expunged. Schools have switched to the Russian curriculum, and Russian youth and paramilitary organisations work in the territories. Repression combined with Russification aims to transform the social and political fabric of the territories, says Nikolay Petrov, the author of a new report for the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

Russia occupies some 18% of Ukraine. Crimea was annexed in 2014, but those parts of Donetsk and Luhansk that were occupied at the same time were not formally incorporated into Russia until September 2022. During the intervening period they existed in lawless limbo, and saw an exodus of pro-Ukrainians and the seizure of their businesses and property. Since the full-scale invasion of 2022 Russia has been absorbing them properly, as it has the new territories won since then including parts of Kherson and Zaporizhia provinces, as well as more of Donetsk and Luhansk.

In January 2022 the Ukrainian authorities estimated that there were 6.4m people in the occupied regions, excluding Crimea. Now, according to Mr Petrov, there are about 3.5m. Even Russia’s statistical service admits that people continue to flee, with up to 100,000 from the “new regions” doing so last year. Mr Petrov says there are also about 1.8m people in Crimea, including some who immigrated there after 2014.

Russia has compelled the remaining residents to take Russian citizenship. From January 1st 2025 anyone aged 14 or above who has not will be deemed a foreign citizen and thus be at risk of deportation. Already it is impossible to live normally without it. It is needed in order to send children to school, and to get medical treatment, pensions or social benefits. The Russian authorities have re-registered property and businesses; citizenship is also required for that. Some people who had fled have even returned in an attempt to hold on to their property.

The exodus of people has led to acute labour shortages in the occupied territories. To fill the gap 40,000-50,000 people from Russia and central Asia now work there, Mr Petrov reckons. Many of them are construction workers, but thousands of teachers, medics and administrators also come on well-paid short-term contracts. In an attempt to hide the true cost of annexation, twinning arrangements have been set up, under which Russia’s regions, major companies, universities and cultural institutions must subsidise occupied Ukrainian regions and comparable institutions from their own budgets. These expenses are secret. Investment is encouraged with hefty tax benefits. There is some violent resistance. On October 27th partisans blew up a railway bridge in occupied Berdiansk, according to some reports. There are occasional examples of assassinations of collaborators by partisans. Ukraine’s National Resistance Centre (nrc) is tasked with helping them. But, says “Ostap”, an nrc spokesman, modern partisan activity is “not like in the films”. Though it is possible for groups to kill a few Russians, he says, collecting intelligence on the location of their units and weapons is “of much more value to us” because that “will help us kill 100 with one missile”.

The identity of the occupied territories is changing, fast. Some residents have always been pro-Russian. Now oppression, brainwashing and an exodus means that the balance has shifted further. Some 5-30% of residents in the occupied Zaporizhia and Kherson regions are pro-Russian, 20-35% are pro-Ukrainian while the rest, possibly more than half, “have a wait-and-see” attitude, according to the nrc. “That is why,” says Mr Petrov, “we should not believe in the idea that they are all suffering under occupation and waiting for liberators to come and free them.”

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-19
#1702
lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-19
#1705
Edited 2024-11-19

Putin cambia la doctrina nuclear al dia siguiente.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1guvd9e/putin_approves_updated_nuclear_doctrine_source/

The document says:

The Fundamentals of State Policy specify the characteristics of nuclear deterrence and the conditions for Russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons:

state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is defensive in nature;

**Russia considers nuclear weapons as a means of deterrence, the use of which is an extreme and necessary measure;**

**deterring a potential adversary from aggression against Russia and its allies is one of the highest state priorities;**

**Russia can use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against itself or Belarus, if a critical threat to territorial integrity is created;**

**the aggression of any state from the military coalition against Russia or its allies is considered as aggression of this coalition as a whole;**

**aggression against Russia or its allies by a non-nuclear state with the support of a nuclear state is considered a joint attack;**

**Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies;**

Russia exercises nuclear deterrence against a potential adversary: states, blocs, and alliances that view Russia as an adversary.

The document also reveals the essence of nuclear deterrence:

the state policy on nuclear deterrence is aimed at maintaining the potential of nuclear forces at a level sufficient for nuclear deterrence;

the uncertainty for a potential enemy of the scale and place of use of nuclear forces is referred to the principles of nuclear deterrence;

nuclear deterrence is aimed at ensuring that a potential adversary understands the inevitability of retaliation in the event of aggression against Russia;

state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence in a military conflict guarantees the cessation of hostilities on terms acceptable to Russia;

maintaining the constant readiness of the allocated part of the nuclear deterrence forces for use is attributed to the principles of nuclear deterrence of Russia.

Russia is making all necessary efforts to reduce the nuclear threat;

the deployment of missile defense systems in space by the enemy is a danger that nuclear deterrence is carried out to neutralize;

centralization of control of nuclear forces, including those located outside the territory of Russia, is referred to the principles of nuclear deterrence;

nuclear deterrence is ensured by the presence of the Russian Armed Forces of forces and means capable of inflicting unacceptable damage on the enemy with nuclear weapons.

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-19
#1706

@lowfour (post #1705)

básicamente es, son mis nukes y las uso cuando quiero y tal...

esto es para que los ciberputis cintaspamers nos den la turra (aun más) con el ww3 y el holocausto nuclear y sus idas de olla

lo curioso es que es como decías, llevan desde 2022 con "nukes" y aquí seguimos

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-19
#1707

@lowfour (post #1704)

pero eso te protege si la nuke explota a 50km o algo así, no?

porque como te pille a menos fijo que te quedas igualmente frito (o es una nuke pequeñita de esas "tácticas")

estaría bueno saber qué tiene pensado la otan si ven un hongo nuclear en territorio europeo (o donde sea)

me da que la respuesta no será nuke, salvo que en lugar de un hongo vean varios, y lo de los atacams nos va a parecer una caricia o algo así

lo mismo tienen pensado parar la guerra antes de que trump tome el mando, pero la vía expeditiva de borrar del mapa al putin y sus mariachis

elarquitecto
elarquitecto
2024-11-19
#1708

por cierto, ahora mismo en portada de elpais

Image

nos van avisando de algo o qué?

lowfour
lowfour
2024-11-19
#1709
Edited 2024-11-19

@elarquitecto (post #1707)

Esos ataudes son idénticos a los parkings oxidados que tienen en todos los patios de las casas rusas, para meter el Lada o el Volga y cerrarlo para que no se lo vandalicen o roben los Gopniks locales.

Pero claro... si no tienen tazas de water como coño nos quieren convencer con este PR Stunt Nuclear de que van a poder tener estas mierdas antes de que explote una bomba.

Propaganda ridícula de la peña que está acostumbrada a vivir en la mentira.

Image

Image

Jag
Jag
2024-11-19
#1710
Edited 2024-11-19

@lowfour (post #1704)

Sin fisura alguna hoyga!!!! Sólo tiene que abrir la puerta para salir a coger Berzas mutantes para que la radiación externa si es que sobrevive a la explosión (lo dudooooooo como dirían los panchos) contamine todos los que hay dentro!

Es que son cutres hasta para eso, solamente necesitan una puñetera compuerta con presala cutre y otra compuerta, para saber dar sensación de seguridad ficticia!!!!

Please log in to reply to this discussion.

Log In