Bayah bayah a soros se le va la olla no?
Queremos un GENOCHIDIO palentino si o si!
SS: The article underscores even more problems with the United Nations regarding the war Gaza declared on Israel and the use of the term "Genocide" to describe the Israeli response.
Alice Wairimu Nderitu, a widely respected mediator and authority on peacebuilding and violence prevention, has demonstrated steadfast commitment to upholding the strict legal standards for defining genocide. Her dismissal appears rooted in political disagreements rather than her competence or adherence to these standards. The situation reflects broader issues about how the U.N. approaches conflicts involving Israel, highlighting criticisms of bias and politicization within its structures.
Her stance on genocide adheres to its strict legal definition, which requires proof of intent to destroy an ethnic or religious group in whole or in part. Her rejection of labeling Israel's actions against Hamas as genocide is consistent with this legal standard but runs counter to the narratives pushed by some U.N. factions. This divergence seems to have contributed to her removal.
The controversy illustrates ongoing debates about the U.N.'s credibility, its treatment of Israel, and the politicization of terms with significant moral and legal weight, such as "Genocide."
Since the "Genocide" case started, the UN already replaced the court's head judge to a Lebanese judge, a country currently in war with Israel, with a history of attacking Israel and supporting totalitarian regimes. While also relying heavily on mistranslation out of context quotes of Israeli officials instead of actions, and chose to listen and quote testimonies from "Experts" belonging to clear anti-Israeli orgs including UNRWA themselves, the organization responsible for the indoctrination of Palestinian children to terror and violence, teaching Jihad as the ultimate goal in life using western funds.
