esto es lo mollar del discurso, luego pego el discurso íntegro, porque también tiene su interés
transcripción automática:
It seems that every day we're reminded that we live in an era of great power rivalry, that the rules-based order is fading, that the strong can do what they can and the weak must suffer what they must.
And this apherism of Thusidities is presented as inevitable, as the natural logic of international relations reasserting itself. And faced with this logic, there is a strong tendency for countries to go along to get along, to accommodate, to avoid trouble, to hope that compliance will buy safety. Well, it won't.
Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.
Over the past two decades, a series of crises in finance, health, energy, and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration.
But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.
on Arctic's sovereignty. We stand firmly with Greenland and Denmark and fully support their unique right to determine Greenland's future. [applause] Our commitment to NATO's Article 5 is unwavering. So, we're working with our NATO allies, including the Nordic Baltic Gate, to further secure the alliance's northern and western flanks, including through Canada's unprecedented investments in over the horizon radar, in submarines, in aircraft, and boots on the ground, boots on the ice.
Canada strongly opposes tariffs over Greenland and calls for focused talks to achieve our shared objectives of security and prosperity in the Arctic. Argue that middle powers must act together because if we're not at the table, we're on the menu.
But I'd also say that great powers great powers can afford for now to go it alone. They have the market size, the military capacity, and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hedgeimon, we negotiate from weakness. We accept what's offered. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating. This is not sovereignty. It's the performance of sovereignty while accepting subordination.
antes de continuar con el hilo, breve parada en el pavo:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Carney
economista, fue gobernador del BdC y del BdE (el banco de canada y el de inglaterra) de 2013 a 2020, también fue presidente del consejo de estabilidad financiera del g20
curró en goldman sachs en tokio, nyc y toronto
vamos, se ha comido la crisis de las punto com, la de la inmo y casi la del covic, pero estuvo en pleno BREXIT diciendo que si estaban fumaos o qué, que menuda locura salirse de la ue
corre maratones
y escribe libros (bueno, solo he encontrado uno)
no os apresuréis a concederle el puesto del kra-ken porque el tipo también derogó impuestos al carbono y está "recarbonizando" la economía canadiense
aunque tiene un matiz muy distinto al truchinato; no está jodiendo las renovables
yo creo que quieren duplicar la producción eléctrica y diversificarla (porloquesea, aunque teniendo en cuenta nuestro apagón por las FV, tiene lógica), fijo que se meten en rollos ia en breve
