pues forbes ha estado haciendo números, y ojocuidao que lo mismo musk no iba mal encaminado
para que se entienda, en publicidad, tuiter tiene un retorno de apox 5$/trimestre/usuario
el tipo este saca la calculadora y dice, supongamos un 10% que se apuntan al 8$/mes
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2022/11/14/twitter-would-need-64-million-subscribers-to-replace-existing-revenue-and-cover-existing-losses/
Note that I’m assuming in this model that subscribers, who Elon Musk has said will see half the ads, are still worth the $5/month of non-subscribers in ad revenue. That’s both due to the fact that they’d be more valuable people for advertisers to target — known spenders with money — and heavy users of the site so that even at a 50% ad load, they’d probably still see more ads than non-subscribers.
**If Twitter could pull this model off, it’d be a huge win, with 40% higher revenue.**
(This is all based off Q2 revenue data, Twitter’s last public earnings filing. Revenue numbers will be higher in quarters like Q4 with holiday ad spend.)
además, elon está reduciendo costes (laborales, como buen palillero español) a saco
así que podría ampliar beneficios aunque no alcanzase el 10% de subscriptores premium
el cuento de la lechera??
Lower costs reduce the need for revenue, though they may also reduce Twitter’s ability to innovate, grow, and serve both advertising customers as well as users. Another challenge: a**s a result of the deal to take Twitter private, Musk has saddled the company with more than $25 billion in debt which will require interest payments of about $845 million annually.**