La patrulla sergei kotov ha sido

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_22160_patrol_ship

@lowfour (post #91)

siempre saludaba y tal

el director's cut:

https://twitter.com/TuiteroMartin/status/1764931849661423972

los ruskis dirán que lo han promovido a submarino por su buen desempeño y tal

@Jag (post #88)

tío, que los ruskis usan "carritos de golf" para llevar tropas "en" el frente

la versión china del supacat

el minicat

habrán dicho, total, si van a ir subidos sobre el cacharro que le demos, pues esto que nos cuesta 10 veces menos y corre más

espera, que los tienes por 5k-7k $

https://bodevehicle.en.made-in-china.com/

me lol 🤣

Lo iba a poner justo ahora

https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/1b70dtb/destruction_of_the_patrol_ship_sergei_kotov/

MADRE MIA. Encima lo llevan en multicámara para marcarse un montaje que ni Tarantino.

Ya, pero estaba pensando que seguro que hay unos cuantos barbudos planeando volar algún Ferry o crucero lleno de turistas a bordo.

@elarquitecto (post #93)

Pues tiene su sentido no? Joder, si un BMP va más lento y encima cuesta la de dios y encima ya no tienen... pues les mandas con uno de estos que si los revientan total da igual.

Esta frase la he oído de la doctrina rusa:

Quantity has a quality of its own

@lowfour (post #97)

pero simultáneamente o de apocos?

@lowfour (post #94)

a saber qué planean ahora los ruskis, pero ya han cortado la ruta por el mar rojo por lo de los yemenies, lo cual hace que el suministro asiatico sea mas caro y tarde más rodeando africa

lo de los utv es muy loco, para eso que vayan en suv o algo así, no? aunque es cierto que los bugis estos son más baratos, puedes meter 200 por el precio de un bmp o algo así

pero nomejodas, todos los ejércitos del mundo se han equivocado menos ellos? la solución era ir en chanclas al frente??

@elarquitecto (post #93)

Así les va en sus ataques frontales, las furgos y coches del equipo A tenían más blindaje que eso....... Y más fiabilidad em atrevería a decir.

Son tan Pacos que compran a los Paco premier.....

Nos atacan los rusos a los suecos. Cortes de electricidad constantes, llevamos 3 en mi barrio en una semana.

>

Technical problems with several authorities

> Several Swedish authorities have had technical problems during Tuesday. The Privacy Protection Agency wrote to X at 10 o'clock on Tuesday morning that they were having problems with their website. During the day, Försäkringskassan has made a similar post that they have operational disruptions on their website. In addition, the Financial Supervisory Authority and Kronofogden have experienced problems with their websites, reports Aftonbladet. According to the newspaper, **a pro-Russian hacker group has taken to the messaging service Telegram and claimed to have carried out cyber attacks against Sweden.**

>
>

Later on Tuesday afternoon, Sweden's Riksdag announced that they too have a problem and where they are working to solve it.

>
>

"Right now, it can be difficult to reach parts of the Riksdag's website. We are working to resolve the issue," it says.

esto es casi recochineo

https://twitter.com/GalileoArms/status/1765022959301767407

es que tiene pinta que lo han hecho a la primera toma, o qué? no parece que hayan estado ensayando el colar la granada toda la mañana o algo así

menuda maña se dan, eh? y luego el numerito de cuenta para esponsorizarles o algo así

lo que no pillo que haya dos, uno para drones kamikaze y el otro para nosequé (yo supongo que el mavic ese de la foto, que tiene pinta de ser caro y no lo quieres "kamikazear")

che, en el medievo, los señores de la guerra y tal iban con sus halcones y demás pajarracos de cetrería... hoy vamos con drones tira-granadas que te hacen un flying-turret en un pispas

@lowfour (post #102)

ya sabemos a lo que se dedica cinta en sus madrugadas "caraqueñas" a lanzar ataques ddos a servidores de las eléctricas suecas... que son nazi-occidente-globalista y sionistas, claro

@elarquitecto (post #103)

Pero eso lo llevan haciendo casi desde el principio... si son tanques en zona disputada los revientan porque no los van a poder recuperar y prefieren causarles una baja a los Orcos, que los quieren ver en T34

@lowfour (post #105)

yaya, si yo lo decía por lo de meter la granada en semejante agujero, no por reventarles el tanque ya cascao

es que yo lo veo harto difícil lo de clavar el tiro, eh?

JAJAJA LOS HAN TIMADO COMO A MOBNIKS QUE SON

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1b7awpr/those_mobilized_for_the_war_with_ukraine_will_be/

**"The presidential administration (AP) confirmed that the mobilized will not be allowed to go home until the end of the war with Ukraine**. Such a response from the department was received by the deputy chairman of Yabloko, deputy of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg Boris Vishnevsky.

It states that the dismissal of the mobilized "is possible in accordance with the current legislation, as well as after the termination of the circumstances that served as the basis for the conscription of citizens for military service."

According to Vishnevsky, in this case, the Presidential Administration refers to the 647th decree of President Vladimir Putin of September 21, 2022, which continues to be in force.

Earlier, the Ministry of Defense refused to limit the term of service of the mobilized to one year. The department said that the reservists called up for the war will be returned home as soon as the president signs a decree on the completion of mobilization, and when this happens, Putin will also decide, "based on the achievement of the goals of the NWO." Other options, including rotation, were called "inexpedient."

"This means that the mobilized will continue to serve. This means that the pleas of their wives have not been heard. Those who have been convicted and signed a contract receive a pardon and return home after six months. Those who were called up for "partial mobilization" continue to serve," Vishnevsky stated.

The mobilization took place from September 21 to October 28, 2022. The Ministry of Defense reported that as a result, 302,503 people were drafted into the army, 281 military units and subdivisions were formed. The average age of the reservists was 35 years. More than half of those called up were married, 56.3% have children.

Since Putin has not signed the decree on the end of mobilization, the draft can be resumed at any time. In December, during the Direct Line, the president said that there was no such need yet. He also noted that now there are 244 thousand mobilized in the war in Ukraine, and 41 thousand have been dismissed from service due to reaching the age limit, for health or other reasons. Taking into account the fact that a total of 300,000 reservists were called up to the front, the fate of 15,000 remains unknown.

Due to the fact that the mobilized were forbidden to leave the combat zone until the end of the war, leaving them only the right to leave once every six months, the wives of such servicemen began to massively demand their return home. They create petitions, attack officials with questions on social networks, and regularly go to a rally in the format of laying flowers at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier near the walls of the Kremlin. The husbands of activists of the "Way Home" movement began to be summoned for interrogation by the FSB.

To avoid a second mass mobilization, which caused up to 1 million citizens to flee the country, the authorities are conducting a recruitment campaign for contract soldiers and volunteers. In 2023, 500 thousand people were attracted to the troops in this way, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev reported in January. In the West, these data were treated with skepticism."-The Moscow Times

"Those mobilized will serve “until the goals of the Northern Military District are achieved.”

The presidential administration responded to my appeal calling on the President of Russia to issue a decree on the completion of “partial mobilization” so that those who were mobilized, called up on the basis of Decree No. 647 of September 21, 22, and who have been serving for almost a year and a half, could return home.

The essence of the answer is not encouraging: they write to me that

“dismissal from military service of military personnel undergoing military service under a contract, as well as citizens of the Russian Federation called up for military service upon mobilization into the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is possible in accordance with current legislation, as well as after the termination of the circumstances that served as the basis for the conscription of citizens for military service service."

However, the “current legislation” is in this case the 647th decree. Which continues to operate.

Earlier, the Ministry of Defense reported in response to my appeal, sent at the request of the wives of those mobilized, that “the beginning of the period of partial mobilization was announced by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 21, 2022 No. 647 and the completion of partial mobilization will also be announced by decree of the President of the Russian Federation.” And that “the end date of the period of partial mobilization will be determined by the leadership of the state based on achieving the goals of the special military operation and solving problems.”

That is why, at the request of the wives of the mobilized, I asked to issue a decree to complete the “partial mobilization.”

But, apparently, there are no plans to publish it. The SBO goals have not yet been achieved.

This means that those mobilized will continue to serve.

This means that their wives' requests are not heard.

Those who were convicted and signed a contract receive a pardon and return home after six months.

Those who were called up under “partial mobilization” continue to serve."Channel of the deputy party chairman"Yabloko", deputy of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg Boris Vishnevsky

@lowfour (post #107)

hay que leer la letra pequeña, bro

bueno, da igual, porque te mandan al infierno leas o no (sepas leer o no)

Buah los rusos van a declarar esto día nacional del HIMARS. Después de un año y pico siendo reventados sin ton ni son al final logran reventar un himars y no se lo creen.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1b7afor/russian_strike_on_ukrainian_himars/

Nota:

Tienen ~~39~~ digo 38 HIMARS

y 23 M270 que son como Himars pero con orugas y doble cargador de misiles para reventar orcos a dos manos.

Espero que el director de Mad Max Fury Road esté tomando nota

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1b79ltt/drone_footage_of_another_attempted_russian/

Este ha ganado el premio Darwin del año

https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1b6u7sv/russian_soldier_killed_while_trying_to_capture/

@lowfour (post #109)

parece ser que también se han zumbao un abrams, hoy ración doble de doritos o el equivalente ruski para esos "héroes"

fijo que el solomillov anda como loco y prepara un especial, la otan se desmorona!

@elarquitecto (post #113)

Pues nada que manden 500 Bradleys de esos que tienen aparcados y en perfecto estado.

@lowfour (post #111)

está claro que europa no está a la altura tecnológica de esas máquinas orcas

en warhammer se quedaron muy cortos cuando diseñaron los blindados orcos



al menos con los orcos reconoces que es un tanque, aunque esté hecho con piezas de cualquier cosa, pero es que los ruskis no sabes ya si ves cafeteras con orugas o qué es lo que está pasando

Mientras tanto en Rusia los chinos transfieren su know how

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1b7fdha/russia_uses_facial_recognition_to_detain_navalny/?share_id=4U-wzKXLY3Oft6k6ntoVD&utm_content=1&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&utm_source=share&utm_term=22

mira, el balance de ayer

empate

bueno, más o menos, porque un himars hace más que 10 tanques y 15 blindados rusos (sobre todo si los "blindados" son orcos emulando al equipo A)

@elarquitecto (post #117)

Me pones lo del guano WWIII en un hilo y luego esto.

Es como muy Surkoviano todo no? Muy disonante.

Por un lado nos llega una imagen de la EU acojonada intentando reaccionar a la gran traición de Trump (al que acabarán colgando de un pino, ya veréis).

Por otro lado vemos que los rusos se están dando contra los ukros y no avanzan demasiado y les revientan todo.

Joder en qué quedamos? Es la carrera armamentística de economía de guerra que nos asusta? Ya lo dijo PErun, en 2024 Rusia va a tener más capacidad que occidente de fabricar cosas, pero a partir de ahí se despeñan.

Luego dices... qué cosas fabrican? Los 100 blindados que "fabrican" son restauraciones paco de los restos soviéticos. El T14 ya no se le espera, que tenía pantallas de LCD en vez de CRT's y no hay pa tanto gasto.

Luego miro el vídeo promocional del F35 de Lockheed MArtin y ACOJONA DE VERDAD. No tienen nada que hacer los aviones rusos. Pero NADA.

Entonces cuál es la gran amenaza Rusa? Hay información nueva?

Lo mismo se pregunta un comedoritos en Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/geopolitics/comments/1b7vdei/do_you_think_european_govts_have_intelligence/

Y le contestan

>

I think its far less complicated than you're making it out to be. It's more just an intelligent extrapolation of what Russia's motives are and whether the outcomes are acceptable for europe.

>
>

First, It seems most likely that Russia is waging this war in Ukraine for ideological reasons. It has already cost them far too much to be worth it from a pure return on investment perspective, and Putin has in many interviews explained his ideological reasons for invading.

>
>

On the assumption that Putin isn't lying in those interviews, then he would not stop in Ukraine, because the same ideology claims many other places (the Baltics and Moldova most especially) as Russia's traditional backyard if not Russia's land entirely. This extends to Georgia, to Belarus, and likely to places like poland and finland. Perhaps even eastward to Hokkaido.

>
>

I think they simply have intelligence that Putin was honest about his ideological reasons for invading, and that based on those ideologies he would have no reason to stop after ukraine.

>
>

---

=====================
>
>

Second, from the european perspective, it's similarly critical. Various countries in eastern europe (former yugoslavian areas, the baltics, etc) depend on european promises of support. If they see russia overrun ukraine without anyone coming to help...they are going to start thinking about their own defense and how to assure that war doesn't come to them next. That is bad for europe because it exacerbates the "giant military powers sharing a border" thing that got them into so many wars to begin with. So europe also desperately needs russia to lose or else their back yard gets a lot more dangerous in the forseeable future where they share a border with a larger, more emboldened expansionist dictatorship.

>
>

So even if russia did stop in ukraine in the short term, the success of that expansion would probably lead to worse behavior in the future as a russia+ukraine state looks to expand further in the long run.

>
>

So I don't think it's any kind of magical hidden intelligence, it's just application of some thought experiments to a) what they think motivates putin and b) whether they think a world where russia wins in ukraine would be an acceptable one for european longterm security

>

There are multiple elements here; you identify a few yourself. Sometimes you need to make people aware of the possibility of an event if its occurrence would have horrific consequences.

>
>

There is a real prospect of continued Russian belligerence. Russia's spokespeople say so themselves. But it may not come in the form of Russian troops in Poland. It may be broken gas pipelines, cut internet cables, supporting terrorist attacks, fermenting domestic turmoil, cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure, assassinations on foreign soil. (And most of these have already occurred in the last few years)

>
>

You can be sure that there is a great deal of intelligence being shared among NATO members. There may be questions of i) how to interpret that intelligence and ii) how to react to it. Perhaps some hope to be on Russia's "good side" and reduce the likelihood of them being targetted by those attacks. Some may not care as much about the future of their state, and care more about the potential financial benefits of being in Russia's good graces. And some may hope to dissuade future attacks by actually being prepared.

>

I personally think so, yes. It’s not a Hollywood style “Russia are coming for us” intelligence but likely rather an understanding that Russian plans beyond the subjugation of Ukraine involves a foray into either Moldova or one of the Baltics.

>
>

My personal theory is that it is something along the lines of Putin testing NATO responses with a small incursion into Estonia. He’ll gamble that NATO won’t invoke Article 5 and risk all-out war over a province or two of Estonia, which will enable him to conduct a Donbas style, separatist-led seizure of territory (or at least try to).

>
>

Obviously that would be a massive gamble and could push NATO into a response. European intelligence are aware of these plans and its potential risk of war, hence the warnings that multiple agencies and defence departments have put out across Europe.

>
>

Tl;dr: Euro intelligence agencies are aware of Russian ambitions to push beyond Ukraine, possibly into one of the Baltics, and are ringing alarm bells.

Como resume el gran Vlad Vexler

Putinism is more Al Qaeda than Breznev