os acordáis de lo que trajo @lowfour sobre el tipo ese que decía que crimea era línea roja tocha??
pues...
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/ukraine-victory-russia-defeat/674112/
🦅
A Russia that prevails would be a Russia even further empowered to meddle in Europe and to expand its influence with unlimited violence; a Russia that will have learned that it can commit slaughter and atrocities with impunity; a Russia whose ambitions will grow with success. A Russian victory would, as well, teach the world that the West—including the United States—lacks the resolve, despite its wealth, to follow through on its commitments, offering Beijing an encouraging lesson.
y esto:
Russian defeat does not require a march on Moscow (rarely a good idea in the past), and it does not require a Russia that is defenseless and devastated (impossible without World War III). Rather, it will be achieved inside the heads of Russia’s leaders and population. Russia must be convinced that the military instrument, and its deployment in large-scale war, will inevitably fail, and it must realize that Ukraine is permanently and completely lost.
contra-propaganda ciberputi:
The West needs an aggressive information campaign to drive home the reality of Russian defeat. Russians need to be reminded that their faltering economy is only a tenth the size of the EU’s; that they cannot build and deploy a modern tank; that their latest high-performance jet, the Su-57, will be outnumbered by the F-35s of the four small Nordic states; that their generals are superannuated and incompetent; that their high command is indifferent to their men’s lives; that their equipment is inferior to that of Ukraine; and that their logistics are rotted by graft and corruption.
es cierto que no se mete en si negociar con ucrania y demás, pero entiendo que no se consigue una rusia derrotada si le roba territorio a otro país militarmente al final de la movida, no??
y encima con crímenes de guerra por medio y ciudades arrasadas
