elarquitecto
No me jodas, me lo voy a leer que me encuentro un poco mejor ahora. No si ya puse mi post en plan Paco-tarot y yo creo que vamos a ver un guano que nunca creeríamos. Voladura controlada del eje del mal, cortando el cesped debajo de los pies a los chinos y sus carritos de golf.
Pues no va de que lo van a desmontar:
Summary :
Politico’s “Brussels Playbook” highlights a critical moment in the EU’s foreign policy approach, as it navigates relations with authoritarian leaders in its neighborhood. Having tentatively opened channels with the Syrian regime under Bashar al-Assad, the question now arises whether the bloc might also consider shifting its stance on Belarusian strongman Alexander Lukashenko. The report underscores a growing tension within the EU—caught between its stated values and the pragmatic need to address pressing geopolitical challenges such as migration, regional stability, and energy security.
The piece examines how European diplomats are rethinking their strategies amid a transformed geopolitical landscape. While engagement with Assad has sparked debate within the EU about normalizing ties with regimes it previously sought to isolate, the potential outreach to Minsk presents an even more controversial test case. This recalibration of foreign policy involves reconciling moral principles with the practical considerations of controlling migration routes, countering Russian influence, and maintaining unity among member states with diverging interests.
Key Takeaways:
- Shifting EU Foreign Policy: The EU is reassessing its stance toward authoritarian leaders, moving from isolation and sanctions to cautious engagement.
- From Assad to Lukashenko?: Following initial steps toward dialogue with the Assad regime, the question now is whether the bloc may also soften its line on Belarus’s leadership.
- Moral vs. Pragmatic Considerations: European officials face a dilemma between upholding EU principles (human rights, democracy) and addressing practical pressures (migration control, regional stability).
- Influence of Geopolitical Pressures: The EU’s changing approach is driven by broader challenges like the war in Ukraine, energy dependency, and shifting alliances in its immediate neighborhood.
- Internal Divisions: Not all member states agree on next steps—some advocate for continued isolation, while others push for diplomatic engagement to gain leverage and influence events on the ground.
